Published Literature – This isn’t a comprehensive list, but it’s a good start.
Here’s the new one! → Hager et al. 2017
Additional Literature – mostly gray literature sources and summaries for general consumption:
DASNR Research News article, May 2015.
Presentation to the joint Wilson Ornithological Society/Association of Field Ornithologists annual meeting, May 2014, at Salve Regina University in Newport, Rhode Island:
Summary poster presentation to the annual meeting of the Wilson Ornithological Society, March 2013, at The College of William and Mary in Virginia:
Mar. 2016. Here’s a fairly comprehensive treatise on window collisions and building solutions form our friends at the American Bird Conservancy. I have been consistently impressed with ABC for tackling this issue head-on.
Bird mortality in Canada. (4 October 2013)
6-month summary, July–December 2010. (2 Jan. 2011)
Identification challenges. (15 Nov. 2010)
October 2010 summary. (31 Oct. 2010)
September 2010 summary. (1 Oct. 2010)
Bird-safe glass? (8 Sep. 2010)
First full year of mortality monitoring. (3 Sep. 2010)
American Bird Conservancy brochure on window collisions. (14 Apr. 2010)
Summary for autumn 2009. (30 Dec. 2009)
Solutions for window collisions. (3 Nov. 2009)
Commentary on scavenging rates. (17 Sep. 2009)
Products Designed to Reduce Collisions
ABC’s “Bird Tape” at the Noble Research Center
Aug. 2016. It’s time. Now entering my 7th year of monitoring collision mortality at the Noble Research Center, I finally have the go-ahead to begin window treatments at the NRC and assess their efficacy in a real-world field trial.
In collaboration with Lauren Horner and Matt Webb of the Powdermill Nature Reserve’s Window Strike Project, the American Bird Conservancy has provided their “bird tape” to treat windows at the NRC. (Lauren’s the one who actually packed the box and put it in the mail!) To match recent work in Powdermill’s flight tunnel, I’ll be applying vertical strips of the 2-cm tape with 10 cm between strips.
Treating the NRC would be a huge job if the objective was to treat all the glass. I’ve opted for a test of the west alcoves that have accounted for a consistently large proportion of fatalities in a relatively discrete area. For example, check out how busy they’ve been this spring and summer:
The west alcoves provide the combination of the most consistent problem area in the most easily-treatable situation. We might eventually treat the main north entrance (the biggest cluster of red dots in the image above) but that would be a much bigger job.
Of course, my university doesn’t let people just stick things on windows. I’m grateful to Adrian Self from the office of Facilities Management here at OSU for giving me permission to modify the appearance of a university building. That’s a big deal. It all begins with Part 1 – the cleaning:
Even just working on the panes that are just above the height of my head, this was a big job. Window washing occasionally looks fun, but it gets old after about 2 minutes.
Okay, I’ve completed part 1. Now it’s on to part 2 – test application . . .
Aug. 2016 – Part 2: Test application.
Okay, now I know that washing the windows is the easy part!
I’ve completed my first panel, and it took almost two hours. My lines are only kind of straight and my beautiful window is now a landscape of my fingerprint smudges. But, that should be one less window pane where a bird might meet its end, so it’s totally worth it.